The Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB edges the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX on overall Every18 score (97 vs 95), but that headline number only tells part of the story. The Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX is both the cheaper buy (about $135 used vs $210) and the stronger value pick, which makes it the safer choice if budget matters. They split the two traits most golfers care about: the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB is the more forgiving shafts, while the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX is the faster one — so pick the trait your game needs most. Bottom line: choose the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB if you fit its profile (wood shaft); choose the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX if you lean toward wood shaft.
Side-by-side comparison
Metric
Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB
Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX
Every18 score
97 ✓
95
Forgiveness
82 ✓
72
Speed
77
85 ✓
Feel
82
92 ✓
Value rating
70
90 ✓
Est. used price
$210
$135 ✓
Value index
194
296 ✓
Launch
Low to mid
Profile dependent
Spin
Low
Profile dependent
Fit profile
Wood shaft
Wood shaft
Scores, value indexes, and prices are Every18 editorial estimates for comparison. Verify exact specifications, configuration, condition, and market price before purchasing.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB better than the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX?
On the Every18 editorial score the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB rates higher (97 vs 95 out of 100). "Better" still depends on fit — the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB suits wood shaft, while the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX suits wood shaft.
Which is better value, the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB or the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX?
The Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX scores higher on the Every18 value index. Estimated used prices are about $210 for the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB and $135 for the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX, so the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX is also the cheaper buy.
Which is more forgiving, the Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB or the Project X HZRDUS Smoke RDX?
The Mitsubishi Chemical Diamana WB rates higher for forgiveness (82 vs 72), which usually helps mid- and higher-handicap players hold more fairways and greens.
See how these stack up against the rest of the field.
* As an Amazon Associate, Every18 earns from qualifying purchases. Some links here are affiliate links — using them costs you nothing extra, and it never affects our course ratings.