The Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw edges the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 on overall Every18 score (97 vs 95), but that headline number only tells part of the story. The Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 is both the cheaper buy (about $65 used vs $100) and the stronger value pick, which makes it the safer choice if budget matters. The Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw is the more forgiving of the two, which is the bigger deal for most mid- and higher-handicap players. Bottom line: choose the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw if you fit its profile (wood shaft); choose the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 if you lean toward iron shaft.
Side-by-side comparison
Metric
Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw
Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120
Every18 score
97 ✓
95
Forgiveness
88 ✓
79
Speed
76 ✓
70
Feel
84 ✓
68
Value rating
94 ✓
79
Est. used price
$100
$65 ✓
Value index
407
614 ✓
Launch
Mid to high
Mid to high
Spin
Mid
Mid
Fit profile
Wood shaft
Iron shaft
Scores, value indexes, and prices are Every18 editorial estimates for comparison. Verify exact specifications, configuration, condition, and market price before purchasing.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw better than the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120?
On the Every18 editorial score the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw rates higher (97 vs 95 out of 100). "Better" still depends on fit — the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw suits wood shaft, while the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 suits iron shaft.
Which is better value, the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw or the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120?
The Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 scores higher on the Every18 value index. Estimated used prices are about $100 for the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw and $65 for the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120, so the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120 is also the cheaper buy.
Which is more forgiving, the Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw or the Nippon N.S. Pro Modus3 Tour 120?
The Mitsubishi Chemical Tensei AV Raw rates higher for forgiveness (88 vs 79), which usually helps mid- and higher-handicap players hold more fairways and greens.
See how these stack up against the rest of the field.
* As an Amazon Associate, Every18 earns from qualifying purchases. Some links here are affiliate links — using them costs you nothing extra, and it never affects our course ratings.